Skip to content
  • Basic research
  • Dental materials
  • Endodontics
  • Imaging
  • Implants
  • Infection control
  • Medically compromised and patients with special needs
  • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • Oral hygiene
  • Orthodontics
  • Other
  • Pediatric and preventive dentistry
  • Periodontics and oral medicine
  • Pharmacology
  • Prosthodontics
  • Restorative and aesthetic dentistry

Select Issue

  • Online First
  • 2023
    • VOL 27 – ISSUE 1
  • 2022
    • VOL 26 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 26 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 26 – ISSUE 3
  • 2021
    • VOL 25 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 25 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 25 – ISSUE 3
  • 2020
    • VOL 24 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 24 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 24 – ISSUE 3
  • 2019
    • VOL 23 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 23 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 23 – ISSUE 3
  • 2018
    • VOL 22 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 22 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 22 – ISSUE 3
  • 2017
    • VOL 21 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 21 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 21 – ISSUE 3
  • 2016
    • VOL 20 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 20 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 20 – ISSUE 3
  • 2015
    • VOL 19 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 19 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 19 – ISSUE 3
  • 2014
    • VOL 18 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 18 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 18 – ISSUE 3
  • Issue Archive
Skip to content
  • Balkan Stomatological Society
balkan.dentistry@hotmail.com
  • Facebook
Submit Manuscript
  • Facebook
Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine

Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine

Official Publication of the Balkan Stomatological Society

Submit Manuscript
  • Home
  • For Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit Your Manuscript
  • Articles and Issues
    • Online First
    • Issue Archive
      • 2023 YEAR
        • VOL 27 – ISSUE 1
      • 2022 YEAR
        • VOL 26 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 26 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 26 – ISSUE 3
      • 2021 YEAR
        • VOL 25 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 25 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 25 – ISSUE 3
      • 2020 YEAR
        • VOL 24 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 24 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 24 – ISSUE 3
      • 2019 YEAR
        • VOL 23 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 23 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 23 – ISSUE 3
      • 2018 YEAR
        • VOL 22 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 22 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 22 – ISSUE 3
      • 2017 YEAR
        • VOL 21 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 21 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 21 – ISSUE 3
      • 2016 YEAR
        • VOL 20 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 20 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 20 – ISSUE 3
      • 2015 YEAR
        • VOL 19 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 19 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 19 – ISSUE 3
      • 2014 YEAR
        • VOL 18 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 18 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 18 – ISSUE 3
      • Issue Archive
  • Categories
    • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
    • Periodontics and oral medicine
    • Pediatric and preventive dentistry
    • Restorative and aesthetic dentistry
    • Prosthodontics
    • Endodontics
    • Medically compromised and patients with special needs
    • Basic research
    • Orthodontics
    • Uncategorized
  • About Us
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Policy
  • Contact Us

Quality of life in patients surgically treated for oral carcinoma

vuksavicMarch 20, 2023March 20, 2023

Download Article

Petrović Anđelijaa, Keković Goranb, Sekulić Slobodanc, Mojsilović Slavkoa 

aUniversity of Belgrade, Institute for Medical Research, Serbia
bUniversity of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research ‘Siniša Stanković’, Serbia
cUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Serbia

Abstract

Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to examine quality of life in patients who were surgically treated for oral carcinoma. Material and Methods: The study included patients surgically treated over a 3-year period (2014-2016). Data on patients, tumor type and localization, disease status according to the TNM classification, type of surgical intervention and time since surgery were collected from the medical records. Postsurgery functional and aesthetic results were evaluated using the adapted University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire. Results: Forty patients were included in the study. Male patients were more prevalent (27 vs 13) (ch2=4.225p<0.05). Ratio of planocellular vs adenocarcinoma was 35 vs 5 (ch2=11.404, p=0.0007, a=0.05). Osteotomy was performed in 52.5% of patients, and surgical intervention in the soft tissue was performed in 47.5%. Patients who had recovered >1 year showed better mood (MannWhitney test, p=0.036, a=0.05), functions of speech (Mann-Whitney test p=0.008, a=0.05) and chewing (Mann-Whitney test p=0.04, a=0.05), as well as patients who had soft tissue surgery (chewing: Mann-Whitney test p=0.016, a=0.05; speech: Mann-Whitney test p=0.043, a=0.05). Patients with T1 stage tumors considered their looks less disfigured and had fewer problems in appearing in public, compared with patients with T3 and T4 stage (Dunn’s test, CI -95%). Interest in sex was significantly diminished in patients older than 30 years (Kruskal-Wallis testa (p=0.013, a=0.05). Conclusions: The stage of disease, range of resection and success of reconstruction were decisive parameters for postoperative quality of life. Early detection of disease is of utmost importance for both survival and quality of life of patients with carcinoma.

Keywords: oral cancer; quality of life; postsurgical recovery; stomatognathic function

Reference

Boyle P, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Ann Oncol, 2005;16:481-488

Neville BW, Day TA. Oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions. CA Cancer J Clin, 2002; 52:195-195

Garavello W, Bertuccio P, Levi F, Lucchini F, Bosetti C, Malvezzi M, et al. The oral cancer epidemic in central and eastern Europe. Int J Cancer, 2010;127:160-171

Massano J, Regateiro FS, Januario G, Ferreira A. Oral squamous cell carcinoma:review of prognostic and predictive factors. Oral Surg Oral Med OralPathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2006;102:67-76

Gellrich NC, Schimming R, Schramm A, Schmalohr D, Bremerich A, Kugler J. Pain, function, and psy-chologic outcome before, during, and after intraoral tumor resection. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002;60:772-777

Biazevic MG, Antunes JL, Togni J, de Andrade FP, de Carvalho MB, Wünsch-Filho V. Survival and quality of life of patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer at 1-year follow-up of tumor resection. J Appl Oral Sci, 2010;18:279-284

Weymuller EA Jr, Alsarraf R, Yueh B, Deleyiannis FW, Coltrera MD. Analysis of the performance characteristics of the University of Washington Quality of Life instrument and its modification (UWQOL-R). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2001;127:489-493

Chi AC, Day TA, Neville BW. Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma-an update, 2015;65:401-421

Nordgren M, Hammerlid E, Bjordal K, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Boysen M, Jannert M. Quality of life in oral carcinoma: a 5-year prospective study. Head Neck, 2008;30:461-470

Krishna Rao SV, Mejia G, Roberts-Thomson K, Logan R. Epidemiology of oral cancer in Asia in the past decade-an update (2000-2012). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2013;14:5567-5577

Hammerlid E, Taft C. Health-related quality of life in longterm head and neck cancer survivors: a comparison with general population norms. Br J Cancer, 2001;84:149-156

Juntanong N, Siewchaisakul P, Bradshaw P, Vatanasapt P, Chen SL, Yen AM, et al. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Oral Pre-Malignant Lesions in Northeast Thailand, 2016;17:4175-4179

Iriya PMO, Romaniszen LW, Fernades TMF, Poleti ML. Health-related quality of life of patients with squamous cell carcinoma: a comparison according to tumor location. Braz Oral Res, 2017;31:e105

Rogers SN, Brown JS, Vaughan D. The University of Washington head and neck cancer measure as a predictor of outcome following primary surgery for oral cancer. J Sci Specialties Head Neck, 1999;21:394-401

Barrios R, Bravo M, Gil-Montoya JA, Martínez-Lara I, García-Medina B, Tsakos G. Oral and general health-related quality of life in patients treated for oral cancer compared to control group. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2015;13:9

Andrade FP, Antunes JL, Durazzo MD. Evaluation of the quality of life of patients with oral cancer in Brazil. Braz Oral Res, 2006;20:290-296

Villaret AB, Cappiello J, Piazza C, Pedruzzi B, Nicolai P. Quality of life in patients treated for cancer of the oral cavity requiring reconstruction: a prospective study. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 2008;28:120-125

Taberna M, Inglehart RC, Pickard RKL, Fakhry C, Agrawal A, Katz ML, et al. Significant changes in sexual behavior after a diagnosis of human papillomavirus-positive and human papillomavirus-negative oral cancer. Cancer, 2017;123:1156-1165

Ussher JM, Perz J, Gilbert E, Australian Cancer and Sexuality Study Team. Perceived causes and consequences of sexual changes after cancer for women and men: a mixed method study. BMC Cancer, 2015;15:268

Katz A, Dizon DS. Sexuality after cancer: a model for male survivors. J Sex Med, 2016;13:70-78

Terro W, Crean St J. Prospective, longitudinal assessment of quality of life inpatients with cancer of the head and neck and theirprimary carers. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017;55:613-617

Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine, 2023, vol. 27, br. 1, str. 21-27

Post navigation

Previous: Lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) method in irreversible dental pulp changes of primary teeth
Next: Evaluation of beam hardening artifacts around dental implants: CT study on bovine ribs

Categories

  • Basic research
  • Dental materials
  • Endodontics
  • Imaging
  • Implants
  • Infection control
  • Medically compromised and patients with special needs
  • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • Oral hygiene
  • Orthodontics
  • Other
  • Pediatric and preventive dentistry
  • Periodontics and oral medicine
  • Pharmacology
  • Prosthodontics
  • Restorative and aesthetic dentistry
  • Facebook
  • Author Guidelines
  • Publication Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact us
All Rights Reserved | Theme: BlockWP by Candid Themes.
Go to Balkan Stomatological Society