Skip to content
  • Basic research
  • Dental materials
  • Endodontics
  • Imaging
  • Implants
  • Infection control
  • Medically compromised and patients with special needs
  • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • Oral hygiene
  • Orthodontics
  • Other
  • Pediatric and preventive dentistry
  • Periodontics and oral medicine
  • Pharmacology
  • Prosthodontics
  • Restorative and aesthetic dentistry

Select Issue

  • Online First
  • 2023
    • VOL 27 – ISSUE 1
  • 2022
    • VOL 26 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 26 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 26 – ISSUE 3
  • 2021
    • VOL 25 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 25 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 25 – ISSUE 3
  • 2020
    • VOL 24 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 24 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 24 – ISSUE 3
  • 2019
    • VOL 23 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 23 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 23 – ISSUE 3
  • 2018
    • VOL 22 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 22 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 22 – ISSUE 3
  • 2017
    • VOL 21 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 21 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 21 – ISSUE 3
  • 2016
    • VOL 20 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 20 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 20 – ISSUE 3
  • 2015
    • VOL 19 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 19 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 19 – ISSUE 3
  • 2014
    • VOL 18 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 18 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 18 – ISSUE 3
  • Issue Archive
Skip to content
  • Balkan Stomatological Society
balkan.dentistry@hotmail.com
  • Facebook
Submit Manuscript
  • Facebook
Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine

Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine

Official Publication of the Balkan Stomatological Society

Submit Manuscript
  • Home
  • For Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit Your Manuscript
  • Articles and Issues
    • Online First
    • Issue Archive
      • 2023 YEAR
        • VOL 27 – ISSUE 1
      • 2022 YEAR
        • VOL 26 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 26 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 26 – ISSUE 3
      • 2021 YEAR
        • VOL 25 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 25 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 25 – ISSUE 3
      • 2020 YEAR
        • VOL 24 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 24 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 24 – ISSUE 3
      • 2019 YEAR
        • VOL 23 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 23 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 23 – ISSUE 3
      • 2018 YEAR
        • VOL 22 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 22 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 22 – ISSUE 3
      • 2017 YEAR
        • VOL 21 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 21 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 21 – ISSUE 3
      • 2016 YEAR
        • VOL 20 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 20 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 20 – ISSUE 3
      • 2015 YEAR
        • VOL 19 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 19 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 19 – ISSUE 3
      • 2014 YEAR
        • VOL 18 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 18 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 18 – ISSUE 3
      • Issue Archive
  • Categories
    • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
    • Periodontics and oral medicine
    • Pediatric and preventive dentistry
    • Restorative and aesthetic dentistry
    • Prosthodontics
    • Endodontics
    • Medically compromised and patients with special needs
    • Basic research
    • Orthodontics
    • Uncategorized
  • About Us
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Policy
  • Contact Us

Evaluation of two dental digital imaging systems based on quality scorings, burn-out effects and cervical width determination

Balkan Journal of Dental MedicineOctober 14, 2022October 14, 2022

Download Article

Cesur Aydin Kadera, Demirel Oğuzhanb, Altan Salli Gülayc, Özcan Mutlud

aIstanbul Medipol University, School of Dentistry, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Istanbul, Turkey
bBahçeşehir University, School of Dentistry, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Istanbul, Turkey
cBeykent University, School of Dentistry, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Istanbul, Turkey
dUniversity of Zürich, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science, Dental Materials Unit, Zürich, Switzerland

Summary

Background/Aim: The aim of the present study is to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of two generic image receptors with CMOS and PSP sensors for image quality scoring (IQS), burnout incidences (BI) and cervical widths (CW) with regard to four different exposure times. Material and Methods: 43 incisor teeth within 15 paraffin block models were exposed at 4 different exposure times both for the CMOS and PSP groups, and a total number of 120 images were obtained. All images were evaluated by 3 dentomaxillofacial radiologists via 3 different criteria; IQS, BI, CW. Results: Diagnostic quality scorings between groups displayed statistically significant difference for 0,1; 0,125 and 0,16 SEC exposure times. PSP group revealed higher IQS. For 0,125 and 0,16 seconds exposure times, PSP group showed higher percentages of BI. Average CW were lower in PSP group. Although no statistically significant difference was found between average CW vs. exposure times in the CMOS group; PSP group revealed significant differences among exposure times. We can state that, the PSP system displayed higher image quality so exposure times can be reduced, alas, the same conclusion is not possible with CMOS system used. Conclusions: Image quality perception is higher in PSP system we used, compared with CMOS system. PSP system display more burnout effects with increasing exposure times, while CMOS system is constant.

Keywords: dental digital imaging; phosphor plate; subjective evaluation

Reference

Athar, A., Angelopoulos, C., Katz, J.O., Williams, K.B., Spencer, P. (2008) Radiographic endodontic working length estimation: Comparison of three digital Image receptors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 106:604-608

Berkhout, W. E., Sanderink, G., van der Stelt, P.F. (2003) Digital intra-oral radiography in dentistry: Diagnostic efficacy and dose considerations. Oral Radiol, 19(1): 1-13

Berkhout, W.E., Beuger, D.A., Sanderink, G.C.H., van der Stelt, P.F. (2004) The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: Dose reduction or risk of overexposure?. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 33(1): 1-5

Borg, E. (1999) Some characteristics of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography. Swed Dent J Suppl, 139: 1-67

Borg, E., Gröndahl, H.G. (1996) On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography: A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 25(2): 82-88

Borg, E., Attaelmanan, A., Gröndahl, H.-G. (2000) Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 29(2): 70-75

Chong, B.S., Miller, J., Sidhu, S. (2015) The quality of radiographs accompanying endodontic referrals to a health authority clinic. Br Dent J, 219(2): 69-72

de Melo, D.P., Pontual, A.dos A., Haiter-Neto, F., Alves, M.C., Bóscolo, F.N., Flores, C.P.S. (2019) Effect of different exposure times on caries detection and pixel value in a wireless digital system. Indian J Dent Res, 30(5): 665-669

Doyle, P., Finney, L. (2005) Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 117(1-3): 313-317

Eskandarloo, A., Yousefi, A., Soheili, S., Ghazikhanloo, K., Amini, P., Mohammadpoor, H. (2017) Evaluation of the effect of light and scanning. Open Dent J, 11: 690-700

Farias, G.A., Nejaim, Y., Fontenele, R.C., Haiter-Neto, F., Freitas, D.Q. (2019) Influence of the incorporation of a lead foil to intraoral digital receptors on the image quality and root fracture diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 48: 20180369

Farrier, S.L., Drage, N.A., Newcombe, R.G., Hayes, S.J., Dummer, P.M.H. (2009) A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system. Int Endod J, 42(10): 900-907

Jayachandran, S. (2017) Digital imaging in dentistry: A review. Contemp Clin Dent, 8(2): 193-194

Oliveira, M.L., Ambrosano, G.M.B., Almeida, S.M., Haiter-Neto, F., Tosoni, G.M. (2011) Efficacy of several digital radiographic imaging systems for laboratory determination of endodontic file length. Int Endod J, 44(5): 469-473

Pittayapat, P., Thevissen, P., Fieuws, S., Jacobs, R., Willems, G. (2010) Forensic oral imaging quality of hand-held dental X-ray devices: Comparison of two image receptors and two devices. Forensic Sci Int, 194(1-3): 20-27

Teich, S., Al-Rawi, W., Heima, M., Faddoul, F.F., Goldzweig, G., Gutmacher, Z., Aizenbud, D. (2016) Image quality evaluation of eight complementary metal-oxide semiconductor intraoral digital X-ray sensors. Int Dent J, 66(5): 264-271

van der Stelt, P.F. (2005) Filmless imaging: the uses of digital radiography in dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc, 136: 1379-1387

Vandenberghe, B., Jacobs, R. (2010) The influence of tube potential on periodontal bone level measurements and subjective Image quality using a digital photostimulable storage phosphor sensor. J Oral Maxillofac Res, 1(1): 1-5

Wenzel, A., Møystad, A. (2001) Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 30(4): 203-208

Yalcinkaya, S., Künzel, A., Willers, R., Thoms, M., Becker, J. (2006) Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 101(5): 643-651

Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine, 2020, vol. 24, br. 2, str. 71-76

Post navigation

Previous: Orthodontic management of patients with congenitally missing permanent teeth
Next: The role of Helicobacter pylori in development of lesion in oral cavity

Categories

  • Basic research
  • Dental materials
  • Endodontics
  • Imaging
  • Implants
  • Infection control
  • Medically compromised and patients with special needs
  • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • Oral hygiene
  • Orthodontics
  • Other
  • Pediatric and preventive dentistry
  • Periodontics and oral medicine
  • Pharmacology
  • Prosthodontics
  • Restorative and aesthetic dentistry
  • Facebook
  • Author Guidelines
  • Publication Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact us
All Rights Reserved | Theme: BlockWP by Candid Themes.
Go to Balkan Stomatological Society