Mircheska Marijanaa, Stojanovska Verab, Redzep Enisc, Popovska Lidijab
aEuropean University, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Dental Pathology, Skopje, North Macedonia
b“Ss. Cyril and Methodius” University, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Skopje, North Macedonia
cEuropean University, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Skopje, North Macedonia
Summary
Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the apical extrusion during endodontic retreatment using three different endodontic systems. Material and Methods: 120 extracted human teeth were ex vivo endodontically treated and retreatment was performed using three different endodontic systems. Samples were divided into 3 groups, A-retreatment with Hedstroem hand files, B-retreatment with Pro Taper Retreatment files and C-retreatment with Pro Taper Gold files. Apically extruded material was collected in pre-measured Eppendorfs on a laboratory scale (10-5g). The amount of the extruded material was measured after the retreatment. The data were analysed using the the statistical software: STATISTICA 7.1 and SPSS for Windows 20. Results: The statistical analysis of the data revealed significant differences between the three endodontic retreatment systems (P< 0.05). Apical extrusion in the A endodontic system is significantly greater than the rotary (B and C) endodontic systems. Conclusions: In ex vivo conditions the results of this study showed significant statistical difference between three investigated endodontic retreatment systems concerning the amount of apically exuded material. The largest amount of material suppressed periapically was proven for Hedstroem hand instruments.
Keywords: debris; manual instrumentation; rotary instruments; retreatment; endodontic
Reference
Al-Omari, M.A.O., Dummer, P.M.H. (1995) Canal blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques. J Endod, 21(3): 154-158
Bürklein, S., Schäfer, E. (2012) Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod, 38(6): 850-852
Calişkan, M.K. (2005) Nonsurgical retreatment of teeth with periapical lesions previously managed by either endodontic or surgical intervention. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 100(2): 242-8
Dincer, A.N., Er, O., Canakci, B.C. (2015) Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems. Int Endod J, 48(12): 1194-1198
Elmsallati, E.A., Wadachi, R., Suda, H. (2009) Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel-titanium files with different pitch: A pilot study. Aust Endod J, 35(2): 65-69
Ford, T.R. P., Rhodes, J.S. (2004) Root canal retreatment: 2: Practical solutions. Dent Update, 31(2): 97-102
Friedman, S., Stabholz, A. (1986) Endodontic retreatment: Case selection and technique: Part 1: Criteria for case selection. J Endod, 12(1): 28-33
Friedman, S., Stabholz, A., Tamse, A. (1990) Endodontic retreatment: Case selection and technique: Part 3: Retreatment techniques. J Endod, 16(11): 543-549
Gkampesi, S., Mylona, Z., Zarra, T., Lambrianidis, T. (2016) Assessment of apical extrusion of debris during endodontic retreatment with 3 rotary nickel-titanium retreatment systems and hand files. Balk J Dent Med, vol. 20, br. 1, str. 22-28
Hachmeister, D.R., Schindler, W.G., Walker, W.A., Thomas, D. D. (2002) The sealing ability and retention characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate in a model of apexification. J Endod, 28(5): 386-390
Huang, X., Ling, J., Wei, X., Gu, L. (2007) Quantitative evaluation of debris extruded apically by using ProTaper Universal Tulsa rotary system in endodontic retreatment. J Endod, 33(9): 1102-1105
Hülsmann, M., Stotz, S. (1997) Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J, 30(4): 227-233
Lu, Y., Wang, R., Zhang, L., Li, H.L., Zheng, Q.H., Zhou, X.D., Huang, D.M. (2013) Apically extruded debris and irrigant with two Ni-Ti systems and hand files when removing root fillings: A laboratory study. Int Endod J, 46(12): 1125-1130
Mandel, E., Friedman, S. (1992) Endodontic retreatment: A rational approach to root canal reinstrumentation. J Endod, 18(11): 565-569
Masiero, A.V., Barletta, F.B. (2005) Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment. Int Endod J, 38(1): 2-7
Saad, A.Y., Al-Hadlaq, S.M., Al-Katheeri, N.H. (2007) Efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments in the removal of gutta-percha during root canal retretament. J Endod, 33(1): 38-41
Salzgeber, R. M., Brilliant, J. D. (1977) An in vivo evaluation of the penetration of an irrigating solution in root canals. J Endod, 3(10): 394-398
Silva, E.J.N.L., Sá, L., Belladonna, F.G., Neves, A.A., Accorsi-Mendonça, T., Vieira, V.T.L., De-Deus, G., Moreira, E.J. (2014) Reciprocating versus rotary systems for root filling removal: Assessment of the apically extruded material. J Endod, 40(12): 2077-2080
Somma, F., Cammarota, G., Plotino, G., Grande, N.M., Pameijer, C.H. (2008) The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials. J Endod, 34(4): 466-469
Stabholz, A., Friedman, S. (1988) Endodontic retreatment: Case selection and technique: Part 2: Treatment planning for retreatment. J Endod, 14(12): 607-614
Taintor, J., Ingle, J., Fahid, A. (1983) Retreatment versus further treatment. Clin Prevent Dent, 5: 8-14
Tanalp, J., Güngör, T. (2014) Apical extrusion of debris: A literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment. Int Endod J, 47(3): 211-221
Topçuoğlu, H.S., Aktı, A., Tuncay, Ö., Dinçer, A.N., Düzgün, S., Topçuoğlu, G. (2014) Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files. J Endod, 40(12): 2066-2069
Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine, 2020, vol. 24, br. 3, str. 142-147