Skip to content
  • Basic research
  • Dental materials
  • Endodontics
  • Imaging
  • Implants
  • Infection control
  • Medically compromised and patients with special needs
  • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • Oral hygiene
  • Orthodontics
  • Other
  • Pediatric and preventive dentistry
  • Periodontics and oral medicine
  • Pharmacology
  • Prosthodontics
  • Restorative and aesthetic dentistry

Select Issue

  • Online First
  • 2023
    • VOL 27 – ISSUE 1
  • 2022
    • VOL 26 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 26 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 26 – ISSUE 3
  • 2021
    • VOL 25 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 25 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 25 – ISSUE 3
  • 2020
    • VOL 24 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 24 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 24 – ISSUE 3
  • 2019
    • VOL 23 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 23 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 23 – ISSUE 3
  • 2018
    • VOL 22 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 22 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 22 – ISSUE 3
  • 2017
    • VOL 21 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 21 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 21 – ISSUE 3
  • 2016
    • VOL 20 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 20 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 20 – ISSUE 3
  • 2015
    • VOL 19 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 19 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 19 – ISSUE 3
  • 2014
    • VOL 18 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 18 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 18 – ISSUE 3
  • Issue Archive
Skip to content
  • Balkan Stomatological Society
balkan.dentistry@hotmail.com
  • Facebook
Submit Manuscript
  • Facebook
Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine

Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine

Official Publication of the Balkan Stomatological Society

Submit Manuscript
  • Home
  • For Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit Your Manuscript
  • Articles and Issues
    • Online First
    • Issue Archive
      • 2023 YEAR
        • VOL 27 – ISSUE 1
      • 2022 YEAR
        • VOL 26 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 26 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 26 – ISSUE 3
      • 2021 YEAR
        • VOL 25 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 25 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 25 – ISSUE 3
      • 2020 YEAR
        • VOL 24 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 24 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 24 – ISSUE 3
      • 2019 YEAR
        • VOL 23 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 23 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 23 – ISSUE 3
      • 2018 YEAR
        • VOL 22 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 22 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 22 – ISSUE 3
      • 2017 YEAR
        • VOL 21 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 21 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 21 – ISSUE 3
      • 2016 YEAR
        • VOL 20 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 20 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 20 – ISSUE 3
      • 2015 YEAR
        • VOL 19 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 19 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 19 – ISSUE 3
      • 2014 YEAR
        • VOL 18 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 18 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 18 – ISSUE 3
      • Issue Archive
  • Categories
    • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
    • Periodontics and oral medicine
    • Pediatric and preventive dentistry
    • Restorative and aesthetic dentistry
    • Prosthodontics
    • Endodontics
    • Medically compromised and patients with special needs
    • Basic research
    • Orthodontics
    • Uncategorized
  • About Us
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Policy
  • Contact Us

Evaluation of apical extrusion during conventional retreatment with three endodontic systems

Balkan Journal of Dental MedicineOctober 14, 2022October 14, 2022

Download Article

Mircheska Marijanaa, Stojanovska Verab, Redzep Enisc, Popovska Lidijab

aEuropean University, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Dental Pathology, Skopje, North Macedonia
b“Ss. Cyril and Methodius” University, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Skopje, North Macedonia
cEuropean University, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Skopje, North Macedonia

Summary

Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the apical extrusion during endodontic retreatment using three different endodontic systems. Material and Methods: 120 extracted human teeth were ex vivo endodontically treated and retreatment was performed using three different endodontic systems. Samples were divided into 3 groups, A-retreatment with Hedstroem hand files, B-retreatment with Pro Taper Retreatment files and C-retreatment with Pro Taper Gold files. Apically extruded material was collected in pre-measured Eppendorfs on a laboratory scale (10-5g). The amount of the extruded material was measured after the retreatment. The data were analysed using the the statistical software: STATISTICA 7.1 and SPSS for Windows 20. Results: The statistical analysis of the data revealed significant differences between the three endodontic retreatment systems (P< 0.05). Apical extrusion in the A endodontic system is significantly greater than the rotary (B and C) endodontic systems. Conclusions: In ex vivo conditions the results of this study showed significant statistical difference between three investigated endodontic retreatment systems concerning the amount of apically exuded material. The largest amount of material suppressed periapically was proven for Hedstroem hand instruments.

Keywords: debris; manual instrumentation; rotary instruments; retreatment; endodontic

Reference

Al-Omari, M.A.O., Dummer, P.M.H. (1995) Canal blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques. J Endod, 21(3): 154-158

Bürklein, S., Schäfer, E. (2012) Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod, 38(6): 850-852

Calişkan, M.K. (2005) Nonsurgical retreatment of teeth with periapical lesions previously managed by either endodontic or surgical intervention. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 100(2): 242-8

Dincer, A.N., Er, O., Canakci, B.C. (2015) Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems. Int Endod J, 48(12): 1194-1198

Elmsallati, E.A., Wadachi, R., Suda, H. (2009) Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel-titanium files with different pitch: A pilot study. Aust Endod J, 35(2): 65-69

Ford, T.R. P., Rhodes, J.S. (2004) Root canal retreatment: 2: Practical solutions. Dent Update, 31(2): 97-102

Friedman, S., Stabholz, A. (1986) Endodontic retreatment: Case selection and technique: Part 1: Criteria for case selection. J Endod, 12(1): 28-33

Friedman, S., Stabholz, A., Tamse, A. (1990) Endodontic retreatment: Case selection and technique: Part 3: Retreatment techniques. J Endod, 16(11): 543-549

Gkampesi, S., Mylona, Z., Zarra, T., Lambrianidis, T. (2016) Assessment of apical extrusion of debris during endodontic retreatment with 3 rotary nickel-titanium retreatment systems and hand files. Balk J Dent Med, vol. 20, br. 1, str. 22-28

Hachmeister, D.R., Schindler, W.G., Walker, W.A., Thomas, D. D. (2002) The sealing ability and retention characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate in a model of apexification. J Endod, 28(5): 386-390

Huang, X., Ling, J., Wei, X., Gu, L. (2007) Quantitative evaluation of debris extruded apically by using ProTaper Universal Tulsa rotary system in endodontic retreatment. J Endod, 33(9): 1102-1105

Hülsmann, M., Stotz, S. (1997) Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J, 30(4): 227-233

Lu, Y., Wang, R., Zhang, L., Li, H.L., Zheng, Q.H., Zhou, X.D., Huang, D.M. (2013) Apically extruded debris and irrigant with two Ni-Ti systems and hand files when removing root fillings: A laboratory study. Int Endod J, 46(12): 1125-1130

Mandel, E., Friedman, S. (1992) Endodontic retreatment: A rational approach to root canal reinstrumentation. J Endod, 18(11): 565-569

Masiero, A.V., Barletta, F.B. (2005) Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment. Int Endod J, 38(1): 2-7

Saad, A.Y., Al-Hadlaq, S.M., Al-Katheeri, N.H. (2007) Efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments in the removal of gutta-percha during root canal retretament. J Endod, 33(1): 38-41

Salzgeber, R. M., Brilliant, J. D. (1977) An in vivo evaluation of the penetration of an irrigating solution in root canals. J Endod, 3(10): 394-398

Silva, E.J.N.L., Sá, L., Belladonna, F.G., Neves, A.A., Accorsi-Mendonça, T., Vieira, V.T.L., De-Deus, G., Moreira, E.J. (2014) Reciprocating versus rotary systems for root filling removal: Assessment of the apically extruded material. J Endod, 40(12): 2077-2080

Somma, F., Cammarota, G., Plotino, G., Grande, N.M., Pameijer, C.H. (2008) The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials. J Endod, 34(4): 466-469

Stabholz, A., Friedman, S. (1988) Endodontic retreatment: Case selection and technique: Part 2: Treatment planning for retreatment. J Endod, 14(12): 607-614

Taintor, J., Ingle, J., Fahid, A. (1983) Retreatment versus further treatment. Clin Prevent Dent, 5: 8-14

Tanalp, J., Güngör, T. (2014) Apical extrusion of debris: A literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment. Int Endod J, 47(3): 211-221

Topçuoğlu, H.S., Aktı, A., Tuncay, Ö., Dinçer, A.N., Düzgün, S., Topçuoğlu, G. (2014) Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files. J Endod, 40(12): 2066-2069

Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine, 2020, vol. 24, br. 3, str. 142-147

Post navigation

Previous: Antibiofilm activities of fluoride releasing restorative materials
Next: Accuracy of in vitro radiographs in determining the remaining dentin thickness below deep dentin caries in deciduous molars

Categories

  • Basic research
  • Dental materials
  • Endodontics
  • Imaging
  • Implants
  • Infection control
  • Medically compromised and patients with special needs
  • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • Oral hygiene
  • Orthodontics
  • Other
  • Pediatric and preventive dentistry
  • Periodontics and oral medicine
  • Pharmacology
  • Prosthodontics
  • Restorative and aesthetic dentistry
  • Facebook
  • Author Guidelines
  • Publication Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact us
All Rights Reserved | Theme: BlockWP by Candid Themes.
Go to Balkan Stomatological Society