V. Petrović1 / N. Pejčić1 / P. Bulat2 / M. Djurić-Jovičić3 / N. Miljković4 / D. Marković1
1University of Belgrade, Clinic for Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry School of Dental Medicine
2University of Belgrade, Serbian Institute of Occupational Health School of Medicine
3University of Belgrade, Innovation Center School of Electrical Engineering
4University of Belgrade, Signals and System Department School of Electrical Engineering Belgrade, Serbia
Aim: The purpose was to assess ergonomic risk level in dentistry, which may contribute to manifestation of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD).
Methods and Materials: The study included ten dentists, postgraduate students, mean age (33 ± 3.4). Participants were asked to perform typical dental examination in standing and sitting positions. The surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded during dental work from both left and right shoulder muscles: descendent trapezius muscle (T); back muscles: erector spinae muscle (ES); and neck muscles: sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) and splenius capitis muscle (SC).
Results: High muscles forces, greater than 21% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), which could be indicative of high risk, particularly occurred in muscles SC on both sides of the body in the sitting position. The medium risk level occurred in the same muscles on both sides in standing position. Left and right T muscles were under medium ergonomic risk level in both, sitting and standing working positions. SCM muscles on the left and right side of the body in both working positions were under low risk level, lower than 10% of the MVC. In sitting position, medium risk level occurred in ES muscles on both body sides, while in standing position the risk was low.
Conclusion: Dentists are exposed to ergonomic risk. By combining both sitting and standing position the risk can be reduced.
Keywords: Musculoskeletal disorders; Dentistry; Electromyography; Ergonomic risk
References
- Graham C. Ergonomics in dentistry, Part 1. Dent Today, 2002; 21(4):98-103.
- Waddell G. Biopsychosocial analysis of low back pain. Ballieres Clinical Rheum, 1992; 6:523-527.
- Fish DR, Morris-Allen DM. Musculoskeletal disorders in dentists. N Y State Dent J, 1998; 64:44-48.
- Nachemson AL. Spinal disorders. Overall impact on society and the need for orthopedic resources. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, 1991; 241:17-22. [Crossref]
- Navah ZR, Yaros T, Mizlik A, Kanner T. Musculoskeletal symptoms among dentists in relation to work posture. Work, 2000; 15:153-158.
- Puriene A, Janulyte V, Musteikyte M, Bendinskaite R. General health of dentists. Literature review. Stomatologija, 2007; 9:10-20.
- Hayes M, Smith D, Cockrell D. An international review of musculoskeletal disorders in the dental hygiene profession. Int Dent J, 2010; 60:343-352. [Web of Science]
- Leggat PA, Kedjarune U, Smith DR. Occupational health problems in modern dentistry. Ind Health, 2007; 45:611-621. [Crossref]
- Hayes MJ, Cockrell D, Smith DR. A systematic review of musculoskeletal disorders among dental professionals. Int J Dent Hygiene, 7, 2009;159-165. [Crossref] [Web of Science]
- Shugars DA, Williams D, Cline SJ, Fishburne C Jr. Musculoskeletal back pain among dentists. Gen Dent, 1984; 32(6):481-485.
- Finsen L, Christensen H, Bakke M. Musculoskeletal disorders among dentists and variation in dental work. Appl Ergon, 1998; 29(2):119-125. [Crossref]
- Rundcrantz B, Johnsson B, Moritz L. Occupational cervicobrachial disorders among dentists: Analysis of ergonomics and locomotor functions. Swed Dent J, 1991; 15(5):105-115.
- Rundcrantz BL, Johnsson B, Moritz U. Cervical pain and discomfort among dentists. Epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects. Part 1. A survey of pain and discomfort. Swed Dent J, 1990; 14:71-80.
- Corlett EN. Pain, posture and performance. In: Corlett EN, Richardson J (Eds). Stress, Work Design and Productivity. London: Wiley, 1981; pp 27-42.
- Gupta S. Ergonomic applications to dental practice. Indian J Dent Res, 2011; 22(6):816-822. [Crossref]
- Åkesson I, Balogh I, Hansson G-Å. Physical workload in neck, shoulders and wrists/hands in dental hygienists during a work-day. Appl Ergon, 2012; 43:803-811. [Web of Science] [Crossref]
- Astrand P, Rodahl K. Textbook of work physiology: Physiological basis of exercise. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986; pp 115-122.
- Karwowsi W, Marras W. The occupational Ergonomics Handbook. Florida: CRC Press LLC, 1999; pp 1765-1766.
- Bogduk N. Clinical anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum. 3rd ed. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone, 1999; p 139.
- Milerad E, Ericson O, Nisell R, Kilbom A. An electromyographic study of dental work. Ergonomics, 1991; 34(7):953-962. [Crossref]
- Takala E-P. Assessment of neck-shoulder disorders in occupational health care practice. Institute of occupational health, Finland, Helsinki. 1991; pp 1-69.
- Murtomaa H. Work-related complaints of dentists and dental assistants. Int Arch Occup Environ Health SO, 1982; pp 231-236. [Crossref]
- Jonsson B. Measurement and evaluation of local muscular strain in the shoulder during constrained work. J Hum Ergol, 1982; 11:73-88.
- Hsaio H, Keyserlinwg M. Evaluating posture behaviour during seated tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1991: 8:313-334. [Crossref]
- Akesson I, Hansson G-A, Balogh I, Moritz U, Skerfving S. Quantifying work load in neck, shoulders and wrists in female dentists. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 1997; 69:461-474. [Crossref]
- Calliet R. Low back pain syndrome. 5th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis, 1995; pp 10, 94-143, 279.
- Haslegrave CM. What do we mean by a “working posture?” Ergonomics, 1994; 37:781-799. [Crossref]
- Guay AH. The American Dental Association and dental ergonomics: Research, observations and activities. In: Murpy DC (Ed). Ergonomics and dental care worker. Washington: American Public Health Association, 1998.
- Beach JC, DeBaise CB. Assessment of ergonomic education in dental hygiene curricula. J Dent Educ, 1998; 62(6):421-425.
- Yalcinkaya SE, Fisekcioglu E, Gursoy B. Evaluation of the Infection Control Approaches of Turkish General Dental Practitioners and Oral Specialists. Balk J Stom, 2006; 10:12-18.