Izgi Ayça Deniza, Kaya Eylemb, Kale Edizc, Zortuk Mustafad
aDicle University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Diyarbakir, Turkey
bMersin Oral and Dental Health Hospital, Mersin, Turkey
cPrivate Dental Practice, Bursa, Turkey
dMustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Hatay, Turkey
Summary
Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of glass ceramic inlay system using 2 antibacterial adhesive luting protocols with 2 cementation techniques to bur-cut dentin. Material and Methods: Class I inlay cavities with 6-degree occlusal divergence and size of 6-, 3and 2-mm in length, width and depth, were prepared on extracted human molars, randomly assigned to 2 main groups; each to 1 cementation technique, with or without immediate-dentin-bonding (IDB or NIDB) further divided into 3 subgroups; 2 to 2 antibacterial luting protocols, traditional (T) and experimental (E); and 1 to a control (C) group. In group IDBT, IDB-E and IDB-C dentin bonding was applied immediately after cavity preparation. In group NIDB-T, NIDB-E and NIDB-C dentin bonding was applied just before cementation of the restorations. The cavities in IDB-T and NIDB-T were treated with 2% chlorhexidine-digluconate (CHX) prior to dentin bonding application. The cavities in IDB-E and NIDB-E were treated only with dentin bonding system containing MDPB (12-methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide) active monomer featuring antibacterial effect. IDB-C and NIDB-C served as control. Dual-cure adhesive resin cement was used for the cementation of Lithium disilicatebased ceramic inlay restorations. Fourteen test specimens per group were prepared for microtensile testing and consecutively subjected to tensile load at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The mode of failure was observed under SEM and evaluated for each group. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to investigate the statistical difference between groups (a=0.05). Results: The microtensile load was 5.96 MPa (median: 5.99 MPa) for IDB-T, 7.23 MPa (median: 7.55 MPa) for IDB-E, 6.68 MPa (median: 6.56 MPa) for IDB-C, 7.24 MPa (median: 7.20 MPa) for NIDB-T, 6.98 MPa (median: 6.30 MPa) for NIDB-E, and 7.02 MPa (median: 6.99 MPa) for NIDB-C, with no statistical difference between the groups (p>0.05). SEM monitoring for mode of failure revealed either cohesive (within resin cement) or adhesivecohesive (mostly within resin cement along with partially involved areas between resin cement and ceramic restoration) character. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the current study, none of the tested antibacterial luting protocols with either cementation technique was found to be superior in terms of bond strength.
Keywords: inlays; glass ceramics; immediate-dentin-bonding; microtensile bond strength; antibacterial cleansing effect
Reference
Blatz, M.B., Sadan, A., Kern, M. (2003) Resin-ceramic bonding: A review of the literature. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 89(3): 268-274
Brännström, M. (1986) The cause of postrestorative sensitivity and its prevention. Journal of Endodontics, 12(10): 475-481
Burke, F.J. (2003) From Extension for Prevention to Prevention of Extension: Minimal Intervention Dentistry. Dental Update, 30(9): 492-502
Burrow, M.F., Takakura, H., Nakajima, M., Inai, N., Tagami, J., Takatsu, T. (1994) The influence of age and depth of dentin on bonding. Dental Materials, 10(4): 241-246
Cal, E., Türkün, Ş.L., Türkün, M., Toman, M., Toksavul, S. (2006) Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites. Journal of Dentistry, 34(6): 372-380
Cao, D., Hollis, R., Christensen, G.J., Christensen, R.P. (1995) Effect of tooth disinfecting procedures on dentin shear bond strength. J Dent Res, 74: 73-73
Cattell, M.J., Knowles, J.C., Clarke, R.L., Lynch, E. (1999) The biaxial flexural strength of two pressable ceramic systems. Journal of Dentistry, 27(3): 183-196
de Castro, F.L., de Andrade, M.F., Duarte, Júnior S.L., Vaz, L.G., Ahid, F.J. (2003) Effect of 2% chlorhexidine on microtensile bond strength of composite to dentin. J Adhes Dent, 5:129-138
de Menezes, M.J.L., Arrais, C.A.G., Giannini, M. (2006) Influence of light-activated and auto and dual-polymerizing adhesive systems on bond strength of indirect composite resin to dentin. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 96(2): 115-121
de Munck, J., van Meerbeek, B., Satoshi, I., Vargas, M., Yoshida, Y., Armstrong, S., et al. (2003) Micro-tensile bond strength of one and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent, 16: 414-420
Gultz, J., Do, L., Boylan, R., Kaim, J., Scherer, W. (1999) Antimicrobial activity of cavity disinfectants. Gen Dent, 47(2): 187-190
Gurgan, S., Bolay, S., Kiremitci, A. (1999) Effect of disinfectant application methods on the bond strength of composite to dentin. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 26(10): 836-840
Imazato, S., Torii, Y., Takatsuka, T., Inoue, K., Ebi, N., Ebisu, S. (2001) Bactericidal effect of dentin primer containing antibacterial monomer methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) against bacteria in human carious dentin. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 28(4): 314-319
Imazato, S. (2003) A new adhesive system incorporating an antibacterial MDPB: Its efficacy and benefit. u: Tagami J. [ur.] Self-etching primer: Current status and its evolution, Tokyo: Kuraray Medical Inc, 1 st ed. p. 67-77
Krämer, N., Lohbauer, U., Frankenberger, R. (2000) Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent, 13: 60-76
Magne, P. (2005) Immediate dentin sealing: A fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent, 17: 144-155
Magne, P., Douglas, W.H. (1999) Porcelain veneers: Dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont, 12(2): 111-21
Magne, P., So, W., Cascione, D. (2007) Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 98(3): 166-174
Meiers, J.C., Kresin, J.C. (1996) Cavity disinfectants and dentin bonding. Oper Dent, 21(4): 153-159
Murata, T., Maseki, T., Nara, Y. (2018) Effect of immediate dentin sealing applications on bonding of CAD/CAM ceramic onlay restoration. Dental Materials Journal, 37(6): 928-939
Okuda, M., Nikaido, T., Maruoka, R., Foxton, R.M., Tagami, J. (2007) Microtensile Bond Strengths to Cavity Floor Dentin in Indirect Composite Restorations using Resin Coating. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 19(1): 38-46
Ozturk, N., Aykent, F. (2003) Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 89(3): 275-281
Pashley, D.H., Carvalho, R.M., Sano, H., Nakajima, M., Yoshiyama, M., Shono, Y., Fernandes, C.A., Tay, F. (1999) The microtensile bond test: A review. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 1:299-309
Pashley, E.L., Comer, R.W., Simpson, M.D., Horner, J.A., Pashley, D.H., Caughman, W.F. (1992) Dentin permeability: Sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent, 17: 13-20
Pisani-Proenca, J., Erhardt, M.C., Valandro, L.F., Gutierrez-Aceves, G., Bolanos-Carmona, M.V., del Castillo-Salmeron, R., et al. (2006) Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 96(6): 412-417
Sorensen, J.A., Cruz, M., Mito, W.T., Raffeiner, O., Meredith, H.R., Foser, H.P. (1999) A clinical investigation on three-unit fixed partial dentures fabricated with a Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 11: 95-106
Stewart, G.P., Jain, P., Hodges, J. (2002) Shear bond strength of resin cements to both ceramic and dentin. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 88(3): 277-284
Tsuchiya, S., Nikaido, T., Sonoda, H., Foxton, R.M., Tagami, J. (2004) Ultrastructure of the dentin-adhesive interface after acid-base challenge. J Adhes Dent, 6:183-190
Türkün, M., Türkün, Ş., Ergücü, Z., Ateş, M. (2006) Is an antibacterial adhesive system more effective than cavity disinfectants?. Am J Dent, 19: 166-170
Yoshikawa, T., Sano, H., Burrow, M.F., Tagami, J., Pashley, D.H. (1999) Effects of Dentin Depth and Cavity Configuration on Bond Strength. Journal of Dental Research, 78(4): 898-905
Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine, 2021, vol. 25, br. 1, str. 13-19