Skip to content
  • Basic research
  • Dental materials
  • Endodontics
  • Imaging
  • Implants
  • Infection control
  • Medically compromised and patients with special needs
  • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • Oral hygiene
  • Orthodontics
  • Other
  • Pediatric and preventive dentistry
  • Periodontics and oral medicine
  • Pharmacology
  • Prosthodontics
  • Restorative and aesthetic dentistry

Select Issue

  • Online First
  • 2023
    • VOL 27 – ISSUE 1
  • 2022
    • VOL 26 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 26 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 26 – ISSUE 3
  • 2021
    • VOL 25 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 25 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 25 – ISSUE 3
  • 2020
    • VOL 24 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 24 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 24 – ISSUE 3
  • 2019
    • VOL 23 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 23 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 23 – ISSUE 3
  • 2018
    • VOL 22 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 22 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 22 – ISSUE 3
  • 2017
    • VOL 21 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 21 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 21 – ISSUE 3
  • 2016
    • VOL 20 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 20 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 20 – ISSUE 3
  • 2015
    • VOL 19 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 19 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 19 – ISSUE 3
  • 2014
    • VOL 18 – ISSUE 1
    • VOL 18 – ISSUE 2
    • VOL 18 – ISSUE 3
  • Issue Archive
Skip to content
  • Balkan Stomatological Society
balkan.dentistry@hotmail.com
  • Facebook
Submit Manuscript
  • Facebook
Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine

Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine

Official Publication of the Balkan Stomatological Society

Submit Manuscript
  • Home
  • For Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit Your Manuscript
  • Articles and Issues
    • Online First
    • Issue Archive
      • 2023 YEAR
        • VOL 27 – ISSUE 1
      • 2022 YEAR
        • VOL 26 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 26 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 26 – ISSUE 3
      • 2021 YEAR
        • VOL 25 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 25 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 25 – ISSUE 3
      • 2020 YEAR
        • VOL 24 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 24 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 24 – ISSUE 3
      • 2019 YEAR
        • VOL 23 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 23 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 23 – ISSUE 3
      • 2018 YEAR
        • VOL 22 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 22 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 22 – ISSUE 3
      • 2017 YEAR
        • VOL 21 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 21 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 21 – ISSUE 3
      • 2016 YEAR
        • VOL 20 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 20 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 20 – ISSUE 3
      • 2015 YEAR
        • VOL 19 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 19 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 19 – ISSUE 3
      • 2014 YEAR
        • VOL 18 – ISSUE 1
        • VOL 18 – ISSUE 2
        • VOL 18 – ISSUE 3
      • Issue Archive
  • Categories
    • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
    • Periodontics and oral medicine
    • Pediatric and preventive dentistry
    • Restorative and aesthetic dentistry
    • Prosthodontics
    • Endodontics
    • Medically compromised and patients with special needs
    • Basic research
    • Orthodontics
    • Uncategorized
  • About Us
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Policy
  • Contact Us

Bond strength evaluation of inlay-retained resin-bonded fixed partial dentures with two different cavity designs and two different adhesive systems: In vitro study

Balkan Journal of Dental MedicineOctober 14, 2022October 14, 2022

Download Article

Kale Ediza, İzgi Ayça Denizb, Niğiz Remzib

aPrivate ESTA Oral and Dental Health Polyclinic, Nilufer County, Bursa, Turkey
bDicle University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Diyarbakir, Turkey

Summary

Background/Aim: The purpose of this in-vitro study was to compare the resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPD) fabricated using two different structural designs and two different antibacterial adhesive lutting protocols in regard to their resistance to debonding. Material and Methods: Forty samples for a model with single missing molar were divided into 4 groups (M1, M2, C1, C2) (n=10). M1 and M2 were prepared in accordance with modified inlay slot-cavity retained RBFPD design; C1 and C2 were prepared according to conventional inlay slot-cavity retained RBFPD design. M1 and C1 cavities were treated with 2% chlorhexidine-based (CHX) cavity disinfectant and 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) containing adhesive system; M2 and C2 cavities were treated with MDP and 12-methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) containing adhesive system featuring antibacterial cavity cleansing effect. The RBFPDs were made of base-metal alloy and their fit surfaces sandblasted with aluminium oxide (Al2O3). Adhesive resin cement was used for cementation, and the RBFPD retainers were interlocked into their corresponding inlay cavities using composite resin. After 1 week being immersed in aqueous environment, the RBFPDs were subjected to tensile loading at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. One way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests were used for statistical evaluation (a=0.05). Mode of failure and tooth damage was also noted. Results: Mean tensile bond strength values were 356 N for M1, 305 N for M2, 467 N for C1, and 455 N for C2. Tensile strength values of C1 and C2 were significantly higher than those of M1 and M2 (p<0.05). The mode of failure was mostly adhesive in character at the metal-cement interface in all groups. Tooth fracture was observed nearly in all specimens. No significant difference was detected between the antibacterial adhesive lutting protocols (p>0.05). Conclusions: The RBFPDs with the conventional design were found to be more retentive than those with the modified design. Using an adhesive system featuring antibacterial properties with no need of separate antibacterial agent application during bonding may be favourable.

Keywords: resin-bonded fixed partial dentures; inlays; dental bonding; tensile strength; antibacterial agent

Reference

Boening, K.W. (1996) Clinical performance of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 76(1): 39-44

Brännström, M. (1986) The cause of postrestorative sensitivity and its prevention. Journal of Endodontics, 12(10): 475-481

Cal, E., Türkün, L. Ş., Türkün, M.Ş., Toman, M., Toksavul, S. (2006) Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites. Journal of Dentistry, 34(6): 372-380

Cao, D., Hollis, R., Christensen, G.J., Christensen, R.P. (1995) Effect of tooth disinfecting procedures on dentin shear bond strength. J Dent Res, 74: 73-73

Chow, T.W., Chung, R.W.C., Chu, F.C.S., Newsome, P.R.H. (2002) Tooth preparations designed for posterior resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: A clinical report. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 88(6): 561-564

Creugers, N.H.J., Käyser, A.F., Van’t, H.M.A. (1992) A seven-and-a-half-year survival study of resin-bonded bridges. Journal of Dental Research, 71(11): 1822-1825

de Castro, F.L., de Andrade, M.F., Júnior, D.S.L., Vaz, L.G., Ahid, F.J. (2003) Effect of 2% chlorhexidine on microtensile bond strength of composite to dentin. J Adhes Dent, 5:129-138

de Munck, J., van Meerbeek, B., Satoshi, I., Vargas, M., Yoshida, Y., Armstrong, S., et al. (2003) Micro-tensile bond strength of one and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent, 16: 414-420

El-Mowafy, O., Rubo, M.H.M. (2000) Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: A literature review with presentation of a novel approach. Int J Prosthodont, 13(6): 460-7

El-Mowafy, O., Rubo, M.H.M. (2000) Retention of a posterior resin-bonded fixed partial denture with a modified design: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont, 13: 425-431

El-Mowafy, O.M. (1998) Posterior resin-bonded fixed partial denture with a modified retentive design: A clinical report. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 80(1): 9-11

Freilich, M.A., Niekrash, C.E., Katz, R.V., Simonsen, R.J. (1990) The effects of resin-bonded and conventional fixed partial dentures on the periodontium: Restoration type evaluated. Journal of the American Dental Association, 121(2): 265-269

Fukegawa, D., Hayakawa, S., Yoshida, Y., Suzuki, K., Osaka, A., van Meerbeek, B. (2006) Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite. Journal of Dental Research, 85(10): 941-944

Garcia, R.N., Reis, A.F., Giannini, M. (2007) Effect of activation mode of dual-cured resin cements and low-viscosity composite liners on bond strength to dentin. Journal of Dentistry, 35(7): 564-569

Garcia-Godoy, F., Kaiser, D.A., Malone, W.F.P., Hubbard, G. (1991) Shear bond strength of two resin adhesives for acid-etched metal prostheses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 65(6): 787-789

Gilmour, A.S.M., Ali, A. (1995) Clinical performance of resin-retained fixed partial dentures bonded with a chemically active luting cement. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 73(6): 569-573

Gultz, J., Do, L., Boylan, R., Kaim, J., Scherer, W. (1999) Antimicrobial activity of cavity disinfectants. Gen Dent, 47(2): 187-90

Gürgan, S., Bolay, Ş., Kiremitçi, A. (1999) Effect of disinfectant application methods on the bond strength of composite to dentin. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 26(10): 836-840

Imazato, S., Torii, Y., Takatsuka, T., Inoue, K., Ebi, N., Ebisu, S. (2001) Bactericidal effect of dentin primer containing antibacterial monomer methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) against bacteria in human carious dentin. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 28(4): 314-319

Imazato, S. (2003) A new adhesive system incorporating an antibacterial MDPB: Its efficacy and benefit. u: Tagami J. [ur.] Self-etching primer: Current status and its evolution, Tokyo: Kuraray Medical Inc, p. 67-77

Imbery, T.A., Eshelman, E. G. (1996) Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: A review of three decades of progress. Journal of the American Dental Association, 127(12): 1751-1760

Izgi, A.D., Kale, E., Eskimez, S. (2013) A prospective cohort study on cast-metal slot-retained resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses in single missing first molar cases: Results after up to 7.5 years. J Adhes Dent, 15: 73-84

Livaditis, G.J. (1980) Cast metal resin-bonded retainers for posterior teeth. Journal of the American Dental Association, 101(6): 926-929

Magne, P., Perakis, N., Belser, U.C., Krejci, I. (2002) Stress distribution of inlay-anchored adhesive fixed partial dentures: A finite element analysis of the influence of restorative materials and abutment preparation design. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 87(5): 516-527

Matsumura, H., Tanoue, N., Atsuta, M. (2000) Adhesive bonding of stainless steels and their component metals. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 27(12): 1054-1059

Meiers, J.C., Kresin, J.C. (1996) Cavity disinfectants and dentin bonding. Oper Dent, 21(4): 153-9

Rammelsberg, P., Pospiech, P., Gernet, W. (1993) Clinical factors affecting adhesive fixed partial dentures: A 6-year study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 70(4): 300-307

Rissin, L., Feldman, R.S., Kapur, K.K., Chauncey, H.H. (1985) Six-year report of the periodontal health of fixed and removable partial denture abutment teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 54(4): 461-467

Shakal, M.A.S., Pfeiffer, P., Hilgers, R.D. (1997) Effect of tooth preparation design on bond strengths of resin-bonded prostheses: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent, 77: 243-249

Shimizu, H., Takahashi, Y. (2004) Retainer design for posterior resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: A technical report. Quintessence Int, 35: 653-654

Stokholm, R., Isidor, F. (1996) Resin-bonded inlay retainer prostheses for posterior teeth: A 5-year clinical study. Int J Prosthodont, 9(2): 161-6

Sturdevant, J.R., Brunson, W.D., Brantleys, C.F., Sturdevant, J.R. (1985) Bond strengths of resin-bonded metal castings. Dental Materials, 1(6): 219-224

Türkün, M., Türkün, Ş., Ergücü, Z., Ateş, M. (2006) Is an antibacterial adhesive system more effective than cavity disinfectants?. Am J Dent, 19: 166-170

Watanabe, F., Powers, J.M., Lorey, R.E. (1988) In vitro bonding of prosthodontic adhesives to dental alloys. Journal of Dental Research, 67(2): 479-483

Wood, M., Thompson, V.P., Romberg, E., Morrison, G. (1996) Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: II: Clinical findings related to prosthodontic characteristics after approximately 10 years. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 76(4): 368-373

Yamashita, A., Yamami, T. (1982) Procedures for applying adhesive resin (MMA-TBB) to crown and bridge restorations: Part I: The influence of dental non-precious alloys and the treatment of inner surface of metal to adhesion. J Jpn Prosthet Dent, 26: 584-591

Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine, 2020, vol. 24, br. 1, str. 21-28

Post navigation

Previous: Knowledge assessment among the fourth and fifth year students on the potentially malignant lesions of oral cavity
Next: The role of the pediatricians in dental caries prevention in Montenegro: The knowledge, attitude and practice

Categories

  • Basic research
  • Dental materials
  • Endodontics
  • Imaging
  • Implants
  • Infection control
  • Medically compromised and patients with special needs
  • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • Oral hygiene
  • Orthodontics
  • Other
  • Pediatric and preventive dentistry
  • Periodontics and oral medicine
  • Pharmacology
  • Prosthodontics
  • Restorative and aesthetic dentistry
  • Facebook
  • Author Guidelines
  • Publication Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact us
All Rights Reserved | Theme: BlockWP by Candid Themes.
Go to Balkan Stomatological Society