Assessment of Apical Extrusion of Debris during Endodontic Retreatment with 3 Rotary Nickel-Titanium Retreatment Systems and Hand Files

References

1. Al-Haddad A, Che A, Aziz Z. Apically extruded debris during removal of realseal using two re-treatment rotary systems. Aus J Basic & Appl Sci, 2011; 5:114-119.
2. Al-Omari M, Dummer P. Canal blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques. J Endod, 1995; 21:154-158.
3. Assmann E, Scarparo RK, Boetcher DE, Grecca FS. Dentin bond strength of two mineral aggregate based and one epoxy resin-based sealers. J Endod, 2012; 38:219-221.
4. Baratto-Filho F, Ferreira EL, Fariniuk LF. Efficiency of the 0.04 taper ProFile during the re-treatment of gutta-percha filled root canals. Int Endod J, 2002; 35:651-654.
5. Brown DC, Moore BK, Brown CE Jr, Newton CW. An in vitro study of apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite during endodontic canal preparation. J Endod, 1995; 21:587-591.
6. Burklein S, Schafer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod, 2012; 38:850-852.
7. Caliscan M. Nonsurgical retreatment of teeth with periapical lesions previously managed by either endodontic or surgical intervention. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2005; 100:242-248. [Crossref]
8. Dincer AN, Er O, Canakci BC. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems. Int Endod J, 2015; 48:1194-1198. [Crossref] [Web of Science]
9. Elmsallati EA, Wadachi R, Suda H. Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel-titanium files with different pitch: a pilot study. Aust Endod J, 2009; 35:65-69. [Crossref]
10. Friedman S, Stabholz A. Endodontic retreatment: case selection and technique -part 1: Criteria for case selection. J Endod, 1986; 12:28-33.
11. Friedman S, Stabholz A, Tamse A. Endodontic retreatment: case selection and technique – part 3: Retreatment techniques. J Endod, 1990; 16:543-549.
12. Friedman S. Management of post-treatment endodontic disease – a current concept of case selection. Aust Endod J, 2000; 23:104-109. [Crossref]
13. Hachmeister DR, Schindler WG, Walker WA, Thomas DD. The sealing ability and retention characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate in a model of apexification. J Endod, 2002; 28:386-390.
14. Huang X, Ling J, Wei X, Gu L. Quantitative evaluation of debris extruded apically by using ProTaper Universal Tulsa rotary system in endodontic retreatment. J Endod, 2007; 33:1102-1105.
15. Hülsmann M, Stotz S. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J, 1997; 30:227-233. [Crossref]
16. Imura N, Kato AS, Hata GI, et al. A comparison of the relative efficacies of four hand and rotary instrumentation techniques during endodontic retreatment. Int Endod J, 2000; 33:361-366 [Crossref]
17. Iriboz E, Sazak Ovecoglu H. Comparison of ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment systems in the removal of resin-based root canal obturation materials during retreatment. Aust Endod J, 2014; 40:6-11. [Web of Science] [Crossref]
18. Lu Y, Wang R, Zhang L, et al. Apically extruded debris and irrigant with two Ni-Ti systems and hand files when removing root fillings: a laboratory study. Int Endod J, 2013; 46:1125-1130. [Crossref] [Web of Science]
19. Mandel E, Friedman S. Endodontic retreatment: a rational approach to root canal reinstrumentation. J Endod, 1992; 18:565-569.
20. Marfisi K, Mercade M, Plotino G, Duran-Sindreu F, Bueno R, Roig M. Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals. Int Endod J, 2010; 43:1022-1028. [Crossref] [Web of Science]
21. Masiero AV, Barletta FB. Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment. Int Endod J, 2005; 38:2-7. [Crossref]
22. Mittal N1, Jain J. Spiral computed tomography assessment of the efficacy of different rotary versus hand retreatment system. J Conserv Dent, 2014; 17:8-12.
23. Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod, 1991; 17:275-279.
24. Neelkantan P, Grotra D, Sharma S. Retreatability of two mineral trioxide aggregate based root canal sealers. A cone beam computed tomography analysis. J Endod, 2013; 39:893-896.
25. Pitt Ford TR, Rhodes JS. Root canal retreatment: 2 practical solutions. Dent Update, 2004; 31:97-102.
26. Rodig T, Hausdörfer T, Konietschke F, Dullin C, Hahn W, Hülsmann M. Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals – a micro-computed tomography study. Int Endod J, 2012; 6:580-589. [Crossref] [Web of Science]
27. Saad AY, Al-Hadlag SM, Al-Katheeri NH. Efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments in the removal of gutta-percha during root canal retretament. J Endod, 2007; 33:38-41.
28. Sagsen B, Ustu Y, Demirbuga S, Palla K. Push-out bond strength of two new calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers to root canal dentine. Int Endod J, 2011; 44:1088-1091. [Crossref]
29. Salzgeber RM, Brilliant JD. An in vivo evaluation of the penetration of an irrigating solution in root canals. J Endod, 1977; 3:394-398.
30. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparation in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1971; 32:271-275.
31. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: Etiological factors. J Endod, 1985; 11:472-478.
32. Silva E, Sa L, Belladona FG. Reciprocating Versus Rotary Systems for Root Filling Removal: Assessment of the Apically Extruded Material. J Endod, 2014; 40:2077-2080. [Web of Science]
33. Siqueira JF Jr. Microbial causes of endodontic flare-ups. Int Endod J, 2003; 36:453-463. [Crossref]
34. Stabholz A, Friedman S. Endodontic retreatment: case selection and technique – part 2: treatment planning for retreatment. J Endod, 1988; 14:607-614.
35. Somma F, Cammarota G, Plotino G. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials. J Endod, 2008; 34:466-469.
36. Taintor J, Ingle J, Fahid A. Retreatment versus further treatment. Clin Prevent Dent, 1983; 5:8-14.
37. Tanalp J, Gungor T. Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment. Int Endod J, 2014; 47:211-221. [Crossref] [Web of Science]
38. Topcuoglu HS, Akti A, Tuncay O, Dincer AN, Duzgun S, Topcyoglu G. Evaluation of Debris Extruded Apically during the Removal of Root Canal Filling Material Using ProTaper, D-RaCe and R-Endo Rotary Nickel-Titanium Retreatment Instruments and Hand Files. J Endod, 2014; 40:2066-2069.
39. Vande Visse JE, Brilliant JD. Effect of the irrigation on the production of extruded material at the root apex during instrumentation. J Endod, 1975; 1:243-246.
40. Vitti R, Prati C, Silva E, Sinboreti M, Zanchi C, Silva S. Ogliary F, Gandolfi M. Physical properties of MTA Fillapex. J Endod, 2013; 39:915-918.