Tušek Ivana, Pohodenko-Chudakova Irinab, Tserakhava Nikolaevnac, Maksimovich Ekaterinad, Karsyuk Yurid, Savich Alexanderd, Mladenović Rašae
aUniverzitet u Novom Sadu, Medicinski fakultet
bBelarusian Collaborating Center of European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgeons, Minsk, Belarus
cBelarusian State Medical University, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Minsk, Belarus
dBelarusian State Medical University, Department of Oral Surgery, Minsk, Belarus
eUniverzitet u Prištini sa privremenim sedištem u Kosovskoj Mitrovici, Medicinski fakultet, Katedra za Stomatologiju
Summary
Background/Aim: Prevention of inflammation and alveolar bone atrophy is very important in oral surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the use of two osteoplastic bio-resorbable membranes in order to prevent inflammatory complications and atrophy of the alveolar part of the mandible after surgical interventions. Material and Methods: We examined 86 patients 45-70 years old who were classified into four groups. In group 1, there were 21 patients who had a “bio-resorbable membrane type 1 implanted. The group 2 consisted of 23 persons treated with bio-resorbable membrane type 2. Only the occurrence of inflammatory complications after the placement of these membranes was monitored. Group 3 included 20 persons treated with membrane type 1 and group 4 included 22 patients treated with membrane type 2 to prevent both inflammatory complications and atrophy of the alveolar part of the mandible. The level of atrophy of the alveolar bone after one year was determined by cone-beam computed tomography. The obtained data were statistically evaluated. Results: Six inflammatory complications (“dry socket”) have been identified in operated patients treated with a membrane type 1 (the first and the third groups). Only two “dry socket” occurred in patients treated with membrane type 2 (the second and fourth groups). Group 4 had significant advantages in the alveolar crest height 14.6 (11.2-22.3) and in its width 7.7 (5.1-10.2) both in relation to the indices of group 3 (11.1 (9.7-20.4) and 6.2 (4.2-9.0). Conclusions: The bio-resorbable membrane type 2 prevented inflammatory complications in the short postoperative period after surgical interventions, as well as, the atrophy of the mandible.
Keywords: Bio-resorbable membranes; Alveolar atrophy; Inflammatory complications; Mandible
Reference
| 1. | Pohodenko-Chudakova IO, Barmutzkaya AZ. Prevention of complications of acute odontogenic infection at the present stage. Stomatologist. 2010;1:20-23. [GS] |
| 2. | Iordanishvili AK, Ponomarev AA, Korovin NV, Gayvoronskaya MG. Frequency and structure of complications after removed of mandibular wisdom teeth. Bashkortostan Med J. 2016;11:71-73. [GS] |
| 3. | Storelli S, Del FM, Scanferla M, Palandrani G, Romeo E. Implant supported cantilevered fixed dental rehabilitations in partially edentulous patients: Systematic review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:253-274. [Crossref] [GS] |
| 4. | Starch-Jensen T, Jensen JD. Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Review of Selected Treatment Modalities. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2017;8(3):e3-e3. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] [GS] |
| 5. | Bazaeva IK, Lalieva ZV. Prevention of complications of dental implantation. In: Proceedings young scientists of Vladikavkaz scientific center of RAS. 2015; p. 47-53. [GS] |
| 6. | Shi B. Aesthetic complications of immediate implant placement of anterior teeth. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018;53:810-814. [GS] |
| 7. | Chen W, Zhi M, Feng Z, Gao P, Yuan Y, Zhang C, et al. Sustained co-delivery of ibuprofen and basic fibroblast growth factor by thermosensitive nanoparticle hydrogel as early local treatment of peri-implantitis. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:1347-1358. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] [GS] |
| 8. | Garayev ZI, Javadov RA, Nasirova XB. Reduction of the ric of complication at the dental implantation. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2014;2:74-76. [GS] |
| 9. | Ushakov AR, Ushakov RV, Dautov HR, Korkin VV. The frequency of infectious and inflammatory complications after dental implantation. In: Proceedings of The VIII Internat Sci and Pract Conf. Belgorod: Publishing house ‘Belgorod’. 2015. [GS] |
| 10. | Ârov Û. Obosnovanie shem podderživaûŝego lečeniâ posle dental’noj implantacii (in Russian). Vestnik stomatologii. 2013;4:63-68. [GS] |
| 11. | Andreasi BM, Andrisani C, Lopez MA, Gaudio RM, Lombardo L, Carinci F. Guided bone regeneration by means of a preformed titanium foil: A case of severe atrophy of edentulous posterior mandible. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2016;30:35-41. [GS] |
| 12. | Fickl S, Fischer K, Petersen N, Happe A, Schlee M, Schlagenhauf U, et al. Dimensional Evaluation of Different Ridge Preservation Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017;37(3):403-410. [Crossref] [GS] |
| 13. | Minina AN, Černina TN. Osnovy dental’noj implantacii: Učebno-metodičeskoe posobie (in Russian). Vitebsk: UO ‘Vitebskij gosudarstvennyj medicinskij universitet’. 2013. [GS] |
| 14. | Lazarenko AV, Kan VV, Terskih SA. Assessment of jaw bone parameters in patients of retirement age with complete and partial absence of teeth. Kuban Sci Med Bull. 2015;151:93-97. [GS] |
| 15. | Rebrova OY. Statistical analysis of medical data: Application of ‘Statistica’ application software package (in Russian). Moscow: Media sphere. 2002. [GS] |
| 16. | Gerasimov AN. Medical statistics (in Russian). Moscow: Medical Information Agency. 2007. [GS] |
| 17. | Avila-Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46:195-223. [Crossref] [GS] |
| 18. | Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Calori GM, Giannoudis PV. The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: Current experimental and clinical evidence. BMC Med. 2012;10(1):81-81. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] [GS] |
| 19. | Bubalo M, Lazić Z, Tatić Z, Milović R, Magić M. The use of collagen membranes in guided tissue regeneration. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2017;74(8):767-772. [Crossref] [GS] [SCIndeks] [pun tekst] |
| 20. | Sbricoli L, Guazzo R, Annunziata M, Gobbato L, Bressan E, Nastri L. Selection of Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Review. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(3):786-786. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] [GS] [1] |
| 21. | Bunyaratavej P, Wang HL. Collagen Membranes: A Review. J Periodontol. 2001;72(2):215-229. [Crossref] [GS] |
| 22. | Pohodenko-Chudakova I, Tserkhava T, Maksimovich K, Zenkevich Y. Complication rate of osteoconductive membranes over fresh alveolar sockets. Stomatology Edu Journal. 2017;4(3):171-174. [Crossref] [GS] |
| 23. | Shevela TL, Pohodenko-Chudakova I, Groshev EY. Results for modern bandaging materials application in alveolitis treatment. Engineering of Biomater. 2011;14:13-14. [GS] |
| 24. | Seliverstov DV, Kuznecov AV, Maskvnin VV, Kondrus’ IV, Novikov LA, Judin VA. The use of biological material ‘Collost’ in the complex surgical treatment of pressure sores of IV degree. Rus Med J. 2015;13:776-780. [GS] |
| 25. | Medvedev YuA, Dyachkova EYu. The surgical treatment of patients with jaw defects after removing teeth based on the utilization of osteoplastic material ‘Collost’ (In Russian). Int Rev Clin Practice and Health. 2015;6:38-45. [GS] |
| 26. | D’amato S, Tartaro G, Itro A, Santagata M. Mandibular bone regeneration after bone slat tehnique. Ann Stomatol. 2017;8:39-44. [GS] |
| 27. | Turri A, Elgali I, Vazirisani F, Johansson A, Emanuelsson L, Dahlin C, et al. Guided bone regeneration is promoted by the molecular events in the membrane compartment. Biomaterials. 2016;84:167-183. [Crossref] [GS] [1] |
| 28. | Thoma DS, Bienz SP, Figuero E, Jung RE, Sanz-Martín I. Efficacy of lateral bone augmentation performed simultaneously with dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46:257-276. [Crossref] [GS] |
| 29. | Lee HJ, Kim MJ, Kim YK, Yun PY. Extraction socket preservation using b-TCP coated with recombinant human BMP (rhBMP-2): Randomized clinical prospective study. Oral Biol Res. 2011;35:110-115. [GS] |
| 30. | Jeong HJ, Gwak SJ, Seo KD, Lee S, Yun JH, Cho YS, et al. Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Composite Scaffold for Simultaneous Alveolar Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Installation. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(5):1863-1863. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] [GS] |
Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine, 2022, vol. 26, br. 1, str. 1-6