Influence of Prosthetic Crowns on Gingival Fluid

[btn url=”” text_color=”#ffffff” bg_color=”#81d742″ icon=”fa-file-pdf-o” icon_position=”start” size=”14″ id=”” target=”NewWindow”]Download Article[/btn]

1 / Ruzhdie Qafmolla2

1Albanian University, Department of Periodontology, Tirana, Albania
2Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthetics, University Hospital Center, Tirana, Albania


Purpose: Evaluation of the impact that a foreign body has in the gingival sulcus, expressed in scale to cause significant gingival infection.

Material and Methods: In a sample of 10 clinical cases with fixed prosthetic appliances in the oral cavity, the levels of gingival fluid to bridge anchoring teeth are measured and compared to the same opposite respective teeth in the mandible and in the maxilla. Measurement of gingival fluid was done with the blue coloured absorbent paper, kept in the gingival sulcus for 60 seconds. With the technique of centrifugation the respective values of gingival fluid were found.

Result: Levels of gingival fluid were distinguishably different around the anchor teeth of bridges compared to natural teeth.

Conclusions: Signs of primary infection onset are manifested by an increased gingival fluid. The presence of a foreign body caused an increase of gingival fluid in the sulcus, as a sign of physical harassment, possibly causing an initial stage of gingival inflammation.

Keywords: Gingival Fluid; Gingival Inflammation


  1. Bastos MF, Lima JA, Vieira PM, et al. TNF-α and IL-4 levels in generalized aggressive periodontitis subjects. Oral Dis, 2009; 15(1):82-87. [Web of Science] [Crossref]
  2. Delima AJ, Van Dyke TE. Origin and function of the cellular components in gingival crevice fluid. Periodontol 2000, 2003; 31(1):55-76. [Crossref]
  3. Erdemir EO, Baran I, Nalcaci R, Apan T. IL-6 and IL-8 levels in GCF of the teeth supporting fixed partial denture. Oral Dis, 2010; 16(1):83-88. [Crossref][Web of Science]
  4. Isik F, Sayinsu K, Arun T, Ünlüçerçi Y. Bone marker levels in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic intrusive tooth movement: A preliminary study. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 2005; 6(2):35-43.
  5. Gera Istvan. Paradontologia. Semmelweis Kiado, 2005; ISBN 9639214515
  6. Chang Kai-Chiao J, Wheater MA, Levyee CJ, Luis AL. Interleukins in Gingival Crevicular Fluid in Patients with Definitive Full-Coverage Restorations.Compendium, 2014; 35(4). Published by AEGIS Communications.
  7. Kamma J, Mombelli A, Tsinidou K, et al. Cytokines in gingival crevicular fluid of adolescents and young adults. Oral Microbiol Immunol, 2009; 24(1):7-10.[Crossref] [Web of Science]
  8. Dhanraj M, Anand S, Ariga P. Evaluation of Subgingival Microflora in All Ceramic Restorations with Subgingival Heavy Chamfer Finish Lines. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 2013; 13(1):19-23. [Crossref]
  9. Orkin DA, Reddy J, Bradshaw D. The relationship of the position of crown margins to gingival health. J Prosthet Dent, 1987; 57(4):421-424. [Crossref][PubMed]
  10. Schätzle M, Land NP, Anerud A, et al. The influence of margins of restorations of the periodontal tissues over 26 years. J Clin Periodontol, 2001; 28(1):57-64. [Crossref]
Citation Information: Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine. Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 92–95, ISSN (Online) 2335-0245, DOI:, July 2015